From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25307 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2004 21:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25299 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2004 21:22:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao01.cox.net) (68.230.240.38) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 21:22:36 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040601212234.RPFH16976.lakermmtao01.cox.net@white>; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:22:34 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVGiR-0000mz-00; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:22:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:22:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Jason Molenda Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files Message-ID: <20040601212235.GB2685@white> Mail-Followup-To: Jason Molenda , Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040412150620.GA9464@white> <20040420141001.GB4465@white> <16519.59247.93650.941260@localhost.redhat.com> <20040426130529.GA11975@white> <20040506221258.GA7008@white> <20040522015250.GA26435@white> <16572.43047.435129.31640@localhost.redhat.com> <20040601180111.GA2685@white> <4CCED8B3-B3FD-11D8-B0D2-000A9569836A@apple.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CCED8B3-B3FD-11D8-B0D2-000A9569836A@apple.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:55:50AM -0700, Jason Molenda wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Bob Rossi wrote: > > >On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 12:00:39PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > >> > >>>>>+ pst->dirname = xstrdup ( comp_unit_die.dirname ); > >>>>>+ > >> > >>Forgot this bit. > > > >Is this the bit you are talking about? > > I'd wager Elena was talking about the spaces inside the parentheses. > > > >The dwarf2 specs say that the name is in the form ":pathname" or > >"hostname:pathname". Should we worry about the hostname? Does gcc emit > >that? I have looked at a few executables and didn't see the hostname > >part. > > After arguing that this was a stupid standard on gdb-patches :-) I made > some snarky comment about it on the dwarf2 mailing list and was > informed that there do exist compilers that emit hostname:pathname. > I'd have to dig up the e-mails to find it, but I think the SGI compiler > was an example of one. > > I'm not arguing that your patch needs to handle this; this hasn't been > properly handled in gdb until now so it's not a regression. Ok, Elena, I am going to commit this with the whitespace changes. Please let me know if this wasn't your intention. Thanks, Bob Rossi