From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16220 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2004 09:26:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16189 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2004 09:26:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.154) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 09:26:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) by filtered-dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C4F229E9C; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:26:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dublin.act-europe.fr ([10.10.0.154]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44285-08; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:26:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from berne.act-europe.fr (berne.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.165]) by dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BA1229E78; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:26:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by berne.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 560) id 71D98592B; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 09:26:00 -0000 From: Jerome Guitton To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] win32: bfd_cache_close after kill Message-ID: <20040601102637.GY2186@act-europe.fr> References: <20040524115048.GA27758@act-europe.fr> <20040525102414.GA28823@act-europe.fr> <40B4F5A2.9000708@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40B4F5A2.9000708@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at act-europe.fr X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney (cagney@gnu.org): > Hmm, unstead of waiting until kill should GDB simply do this when > finished processing each objfile? Users also complain that they can't > rebuild their executable while GDB is debugging. Agreed. > BFD might also be ok with a new bfd_cache_close_all (void) method - > simplify the code needed to do the close letting us put calls in more > places. That is an interesting idea, I will work on that. Where shall I submit BFD patches? GDB and binutils mailing lists? -- Jerome