From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPA mess
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 01:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040601014032.GA4188@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40BBDC52.7060106@gnu.org>
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:30:58PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:43:17PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>>We'll find out - the change will put the additional lookups will put the
> >>>symtab under extra strain.
> >
> >
> >I have trouble thinking anything will break. Both minimal and full
> >symbol lookups are O(1) already and have been for at least two years.
>
> In that case, since the cache was originally added to work around what
> was a >>O(1) lookup, it should no longer be needed.
>
> Of course, if that isn't the case, we'll find out.
>
> When it comes to fixing the problem, we can extend/tighten the symtab
> interface so that other code can also benefit. That is where the cache
> mechanism belongs - not in hp specific code.
OK, I understand now. Thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-01 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-19 20:40 Randolph Chung
2004-05-19 21:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-19 21:44 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-19 22:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-21 18:48 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPAmess Andrew Cagney
2004-05-21 19:02 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPA mess Randolph Chung
[not found] ` <40AE6260.2090205@gnu.org>
2004-05-26 5:27 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-26 13:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-26 15:35 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-26 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-26 17:54 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPAmess Andrew Cagney
2004-05-28 23:43 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPA mess Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-31 19:43 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPAmess Andrew Cagney
2004-05-31 20:43 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPA mess Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-01 1:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-01 1:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-06-03 17:41 ` Randolph Chung
2004-06-04 18:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-24 15:45 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-24 18:55 ` [patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPAmess Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040601014032.GA4188@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox