From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: jimb@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: allocate regsets on gdbarch obstack
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 12:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405201231.i4KCVx0P070862@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2zn83y4fs.fsf@zenia.home>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: 20 May 2004 01:53:59 -0500
Index: gdb/regset.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/regset.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -c -p -r1.2 regset.h
*** gdb/regset.h 20 May 2004 00:53:06 -0000 1.2
--- gdb/regset.h 20 May 2004 05:19:23 -0000
*************** struct regset
*** 51,60 ****
function is COLLECT_REGSET. If the regset has no collect function,
pass NULL for COLLECT_REGSET.
! The object returned is allocated using xmalloc. */
! extern struct regset *regset_xmalloc (void *descr,
! supply_regset_ftype *supply_regset,
! collect_regset_ftype *collect_regset);
#endif /* regset.h */
--- 51,62 ----
function is COLLECT_REGSET. If the regset has no collect function,
pass NULL for COLLECT_REGSET.
! The object returned is allocated on ARCH's obstack. */
! extern struct regset *(regset_obstack_alloc
! (struct gdbarch *arch,
! void *descr,
! supply_regset_ftype *supply_regset,
! collect_regset_ftype *collect_regset));
I'm not entirely happy with the name regset_obstack_alloc. We have
frame_obstack_zalloc and gdbarch_obstack_zalloc, but that's because we
have a frame obstack and a gdbarch obstack. There is no
regset_obstack, so I think regset_obstack_alloc is confusing. How
about just regset_alloc? The caller shouldn't really care about the
way the srorage is provided; the `struct gdbarch' argument already
ties it to a specific architecture.
Now that it gets tied to the architecture anyway, I wonder whether we
should get rid of the descr argument entirely. I might want to tweak
that before you add register sets to any new targets...
Anyway, consider a patch with s/regset_obstack_alloc/regset_obstack/g
and gets rid of the funny parenthesis pre-approved.
Mark
P.S. Sorry to be so pedantic about function name, but I feel the lack
of consistency in naming function is causing too much confusion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-20 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-20 6:58 Jim Blandy
2004-05-20 12:32 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-05-21 22:15 ` Jim Blandy
2004-05-22 12:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-05-21 22:16 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405201231.i4KCVx0P070862@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
--to=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox