From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] New command: ``start'' Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 19:22:00 -0000 Message-id: <20040518192207.GN10684@gnat.com> References: <20040518024700.GV10684@gnat.com> <6480-Tue18May2004093016+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040518170517.GF31800@gnat.com> <9743-Tue18May2004210526+0300-eliz@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00533.html > Okay, this is much more clear now. Perhaps it would be useful to > mention the term ``startup code'' there? Sure. > It's much better, thanks. However, I understand that the same > arguments will be reused later if the user invokes "run", is that > true? If so, I think we should mention that. That's correct. I added a small sentence explaining this. I agree, I was trying to imply this by saying that we call "run" underneath, but that's much clearer that way: Note that the same arguments will be reused if no argument is provided during subsequent calls to @samp{start} or @samp{run}. > > +@table @code > > +@kindex start > > I think an additional index entry here saying > > @cindex run to main procedure Added. > Otherwise, the documentation patch is approved; thanks. Thanks! Attached is the latest version of the patch. -- Joel Attachment: start_doc.diff Description: Text document