From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: randolph@tausq.org
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfa/hppa] Use frame pointer for unwinding
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 16:22:00 -0000
Message-id: <200405161622.i4GGMD20010702@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
References: <20040516020703.GZ566@tausq.org> <200405161036.i4GAaKgg002503@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040516153637.GJ566@tausq.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00469.html

   Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 08:36:38 -0700
   From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>

   of course. is it ok otherwise?

What's the check for NORMAL_FRAME about?  Isn't hppa_frame_cache only
used for normal frames?  I'm not really familiar enough with HPPA to
judge whether this change is right.  All I can say is that this code
tends to have too much special cases, but that's not your fault...

Mark