From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2671 invoked by alias); 8 May 2004 04:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2661 invoked from network); 8 May 2004 04:55:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pippin.tausq.org) (64.81.244.94) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 May 2004 04:55:09 -0000 Received: by pippin.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC200CD28A; Fri, 7 May 2004 21:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 04:55:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [committed] Use frame memory for code reading Message-ID: <20040508045511.GP3965@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20040508040258.GO3965@tausq.org> <20040508045237.GB5860@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040508045237.GB5860@nevyn.them.org> X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > I'm guessing he actually meant get_frame_memory? > > I'm really not sure why we have this many memory access functions. i don't think so.... but i might be wrong :) tramp-frame.c uses safe_frame_unwind_memory (), which is what i think Andrew was talking about. That function calls read_memory_nobpt () after discarding the frame parameter. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/