From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-32938-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6986 invoked by alias); 7 May 2004 22:56:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6979 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 22:56:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 May 2004 22:56:17 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i47MuH0m003212
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 7 May 2004 18:56:17 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i47MuHv20051
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 7 May 2004 18:56:17 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-64.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.64])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i47MuGOq011141;
	Fri, 7 May 2004 18:56:16 -0400
Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2])
	by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i47MuAOR005303;
	Fri, 7 May 2004 15:56:10 -0700
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 22:56:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: handle missing fpregs
Message-Id: <20040507155610.43b806ff@saguaro>
In-Reply-To: <vt2pt9gx81k.fsf@zenia.home>
References: <vt21xlx19f8.fsf@zenia.home>
	<20040507131804.7c9325d6@saguaro>
	<vt2pt9gx81k.fsf@zenia.home>
Organization: Red Hat
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2

On 07 May 2004 16:05:11 -0500
Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > +     /* On RS6000 variants that have no floating-point registers, the
> > > +        next two members will be -1.  */
> > 
> > I'm not comfortable with the term "RS6000 variants" here.  I'd be happier
> > with "PPC variants", though that's probably not strictly correct either.
> > I suppose you could just say "On cores that have no floating-point
> > registers...".
> 
> The issue is that people might not immediately see all PPC's as RS6000
> variants, right?  Fair enough.  "RS6000 variants" is historically
> correct, but it's not like anyone has fabricated an RS6000 in recent
> history.  I've changed that to "On PPC and RS6000 variants that ...".

Okay, that's fine.

Your revised patch is okay to commit.

Thanks!

Kevin