From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22211 invoked by alias); 3 May 2004 22:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22197 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 22:44:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2004 22:44:20 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43MiKkG029690; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:44:20 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i43MiKv21659; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:44:20 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i43MiIH05093; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:44:19 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43MiG2g022143; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:44:16 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i43MiDEY022139; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:44:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 22:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200405032244.i43MiDEY022139@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: cagney@gnu.org CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4096C9AE.9040504@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 03 May 2004 18:37:34 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add host's floatformat References: <40939DD4.3000706@gnu.org> <4093DC36.9040304@gnu.org> <200405020312.i423CSlH008732@greed.delorie.com> <4096996E.9080700@gnu.org> <200405032210.i43MArI1021688@greed.delorie.com> <4096C9AE.9040504@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 > Er, this pattern matching idea is your approach, not mine. I'd > rather just stick with configure.ac. And I offered a function that implemented it, too. Why did you invent a different one? > If there really is a problem such as you describe then surely the > person that encounters that problem gets to fix it. Er, no. The person who causes the problem gets to fix it. Especially when the problem is known beforehand, a workable solution is offered, and you choose otherwise anyway.