From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31785 invoked by alias); 3 May 2004 22:11:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31769 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 22:10:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2004 22:10:59 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43MAxkG020966; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:10:59 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i43MAxv11173; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:10:59 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i43MAwH02253; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:10:58 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43MAs2g021692; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:10:54 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i43MArI1021688; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:10:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 22:11:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200405032210.i43MArI1021688@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: cagney@gnu.org CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4096996E.9080700@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 03 May 2004 15:11:42 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add host's floatformat References: <40939DD4.3000706@gnu.org> <4093DC36.9040304@gnu.org> <200405020312.i423CSlH008732@greed.delorie.com> <4096996E.9080700@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 > Like this? I feel ill. One problem with your approach is that "1.0" may not be a suitable pattern to match for every FPU. I left the test constant in the structure because some FPUs may need more esoteric patterns to differentiate themselves from other FPUs. Hence the comment about keeping them in order, too. Again, libiberty patches must be posted to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org as well as wherever else.