From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22902 invoked by alias); 1 May 2004 14:34:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22888 invoked from network); 1 May 2004 14:34:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.77.109) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 May 2004 14:34:04 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i41EXr9N000315; Sat, 1 May 2004 16:33:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i41EXr3n006732; Sat, 1 May 2004 16:33:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i41EXqbH006729; Sat, 1 May 2004 16:33:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 14:34:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200405011433.i41EXqbH006729@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: cagney@gnu.org CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com In-reply-to: <40939DD4.3000706@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 01 May 2004 08:53:40 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add host's floatformat References: <40939DD4.3000706@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 08:53:40 -0400 From: Andrew Cagney Hello, This patch adds the host's floatformat (when known) to floatformat.[hc]. It lets us wack of a heap of bogus code in GDB's configury. Hmm. I'm all for whacking the xm-*.h files, but isn't it better to keep this local to GDB instead of stuffing it into libiberty? If so, we should probably put most of the stuff in configure.host, such that we can avoid regenerating configure when updating the float support. DJ, any comments? I'll need to double commit. As for DJ's comments: yes a lookup table to determine things at runtime would be better, but implementing that needs some serious work. Mark