From: Jerome Guitton <guitton@act-europe.fr>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] x86 - jump instruction after the prologue
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040427163725.GA7319@act-europe.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040419173249.GA22201@act-europe.fr>
Ping? Still waiting for approval...
(I have a testcase for that, coming soon...)
Jerome Guitton (guitton@act-europe.fr):
> For what I understand from the skip_prologue algorithm in i386-tdep.c,
> there are cases when the first instruction of a function is a jump to
> the prologue code, which is located somewhere else in the function
> (e.g. the end of the function). The last instruction of the prologue
> in this case is a branch to the "real" code.
>
> To take this case into account, GDB applies two corrections:
>
> C1: GDB tests if the first instruction of the function is a jump; if
> so, GDB jumps to the target of the branch (i.e. it follows the branch).
>
> C2: GDB tests if the next instruction after the prologue is a jump; if
> so, it considers that it is a branch back to the "real" beginning of
> the program and follows the branch.
>
> A problem appears if we are in the "usual" case and if the first instruction
> of the "real" code is a branch instruction:
>
> 0x8049454 <_ada_b>: push %ebp
> 0x8049455 <_ada_b+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
> 0x8049457 <_ada_b+3>: jmp 0x8049460 <_ada_b+12>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> In this case, GDB will not apply C1 but will apply C2. That seems wrong to
> me, I cannot see how the pair (not C1, C2) can be correct.
>
> See a possible fix in attachment. Tested on x86-linux, no regression.
>
> OK to apply?
>
> --
> Jerome
> 2004-04-19 Jerome Guitton <guitton@gnat.com>
>
> * i386-tdep.c (i386_skip_prologue): follow the last jump only if the
> function begins with a branch instruction.
>
> Index: i386-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.187
> diff -u -p -r1.187 i386-tdep.c
> --- i386-tdep.c 18 Apr 2004 18:38:04 -0000 1.187
> +++ i386-tdep.c 19 Apr 2004 17:08:36 -0000
> @@ -750,7 +750,15 @@ i386_skip_prologue (CORE_ADDR start_pc)
> }
> }
>
> - return i386_follow_jump (pc);
> + /* If the first instruction of the function is a branch, then the
> + setup sequence is at the end of the function and the instruction
> + at pc is branch back to the start. In this case, follow the
> + jump. */
> +
> + if (i386_follow_jump (start_pc) != start_pc)
> + return i386_follow_jump (pc);
> + else
> + return pc;
> }
>
> /* This function is 64-bit safe. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-27 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-19 17:32 Jerome Guitton
2004-04-27 16:37 ` Jerome Guitton [this message]
2004-04-29 16:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-04-29 16:29 ` Jerome Guitton
2004-05-10 20:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12 10:31 ` Jerome Guitton
2004-08-08 21:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-08 21:46 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-08 22:07 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-08-08 22:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040427163725.GA7319@act-europe.fr \
--to=guitton@act-europe.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox