From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6803 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2004 00:53:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6618 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2004 00:53:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2004 00:53:49 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id CB61A47D63; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:53:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, guitton.at.act-europe.dot.fr@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org Subject: Re: [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc Message-ID: <20040426005349.GQ2811@gnat.com> References: <4089AD34.90607@gnu.org> <20040424182018.GN2811@gnat.com> <200404251144.i3PBiaB6019886@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404251144.i3PBiaB6019886@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 > The following ones seem to be bona fide problems: > > FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-tc > FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-ts > ... > FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: p/c L; call call-sc-tf > > I just checked in a patch that might fix these: I just checked, and unfortunately the failures are still there :-/ > Anyway, can anybody shoot any holes in my new regexp? I did try Daniel's suggestion, and it worked too. -- Joel