From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30848 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2004 00:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30836 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2004 00:25:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2004 00:25:20 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 33ED747D63; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 00:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Randolph Chung Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] hppa-linux target, 2nd try Message-ID: <20040425002520.GP2811@gnat.com> References: <20040424192614.GD2923@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040424192614.GD2923@tausq.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2 > At least 20% of those failures is because malloc() calls to the inferior > are not working (they cause the inferior to segfault). There are also > some problems with watchpoints and multithreaded apps. Definitely > more work to do, but this is much better than before :) I actually started looking at that about 10 days ago, but it is hard for me to figure out what is going wrong, because I don't know too well the machinery for calling functions inside shared libraries. And then I got pre-empted by something else. It's something that's on my reasonably-near-future list. -- Joel