From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24037 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2004 00:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24029 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2004 00:06:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pippin.tausq.org) (64.81.244.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2004 00:06:34 -0000 Received: by pippin.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE3EECD299; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:06:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Fix unwind handling for hppa Message-ID: <20040422000655.GL17842@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20040417080536.GB17842@tausq.org> <20040417163525.GA3521@nevyn.them.org> <40855B13.7060706@gnu.org> <20040421151820.GI17842@tausq.org> <4086ED46.2050809@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4086ED46.2050809@gnu.org> X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 > >+ prologue_end = hppa_skip_prologue (frame_func_unwind (next_frame)); > > Is hppa_skip_prologue needed? skip_prologue_using_sal doesn't touch the > inferior so is more light weight. yeah, i've seen a few instances where skip_prologue_using_sal() was returning 0. i haven't looked into why. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/