From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6484 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2004 12:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6472 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 12:20:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao07.cox.net) (68.230.240.32) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 12:20:17 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040421122016.GXCH172.lakermmtao07.cox.net@white>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:20:16 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BG6PP-0001IA-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:20:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:20:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files Message-ID: <20040421012015.GA4955@white> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com References: <20040225040059.GB19094@white> <16456.65451.461753.66554@localhost.redhat.com> <20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white> <20040329205545.GA26696@white> <20040405214043.GA2052@white> <20040412150620.GA9464@white> <20040420141001.GB4465@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 07:52:44AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:10:01 -0400 > > From: Bob Rossi > > > > Honestly, will someone please review this patch. > > > > Seriously, why is no one looking at this patch? > > It's been over 2 months now! > > Bob, I suggest that you submit another patch that takes into account > all the comments, mainly by Elena and Jason, that still stand after > the discussions back then. Right now, your followups are just > reiterations of Elena's comments and your counter-comments; it's hard > to look at the patch whose many parts are invalidated by discussions. > > If I missed a newer patch you've already sent, please tell me its URL > in the archives, and I will look at it. > > In any case, I think Elena should have the final word, since she is > both responsible for gdb/mi and was the original reviewer of your > submission. But I will try to help her by taking another look at your > code. Thanks, I will do so right away. BTW, is there a program I can run on the patch, to gnuify it? If so, where do I get it? Bob Rossi