Re: [RFA/dwarf] Eliminate dwarf2_tmp_obstack

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:26:21PM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > That's OK, you're right on all counts anyway.  The bug does not render
> > GCC 2.95 code undebuggable; it just interferes with prologue skipping
> > and setting breakpoints on the first line of functions, in some cases. 
> > Both of which are testsuite is heavily biased towards.
> 
> Ummm, just to be clear, you're not about to make the test results worse
> with gcc 2.95.3, are you?

No.  It was a parenthetical comment.  It has nothing to do with any
submitted patch.

> BTW, gcc 2.95.3 on native i686-pc-linux-gnu does indeed default to
> stabs+, but who knows what the default is on various distros.  And here
> is a quick list of some gcc-2 based distros: freebsd 4, netbsd 1.6,
> openbsd 3.4, debian 3.0, vine 2.6, gnoppix 0.6, lindows 4.5,
> lycoris build3.

I do not know of any Linux distribution which changed the default to
dwarf2.

> My personal estimate/opinion is that gdb HEAD can drop support for gcc 2
> some time around October 2005.

"Making the test results worse" is a far cry from "dropping support".

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer