From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24772 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2004 17:43:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24755 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 17:43:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 17:43:51 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 4B5DD47D63; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] get rid of gdb_suppress_entire_file in asm-source.exp Message-ID: <20040419174351.GZ22414@gnat.com> References: <20040419172936.GY22414@gnat.com> <20040419173631.GA12719@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040419173631.GA12719@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 > In general, I agree, but this particular file is a can of worms. > Andrew likes the extremely noisy failure, to encourage people to port > the test to new targets. I'm not sure what I think about it; every > time I run into the issue I just do the port, so... OK, thanks for the feedback. Patch withdrawn for now. I just noticed that the patch was incomplete in any case, since there were several other instances of calls to that function... -- Joel