From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 32058 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2004 17:25:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pippin.tausq.org) (64.81.244.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2004 17:25:40 -0000 Received: by pippin.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09724CD2C9; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:25:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] fix unwind handling on hppa elf targets Message-ID: <20040410180956.GC31873@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20040410094328.GA31873@tausq.org> <20040410165744.GH1114@gnat.com> <20040410174501.GB31873@tausq.org> <20040410172010.GI1114@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040410172010.GI1114@gnat.com> X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 > Have you already tested this patch on hpux-2.0w? That would probably > save me a fair bit of time if I didn't have to. i've done some testing. any particular scenario you want me to test? there are hundreds of test failures on hppa (hpux and linux) so it's difficult to use that to gauge a patch, but in this case i've mostly been looking at "maint print unwind " and matching it against the assembly output (objdump -d). I should also point out that i only test against gcc/binutils. if you are interested in hpux toolchain please give that a spin. thanks randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/