From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 17486 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2004 17:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pippin.tausq.org) (64.81.244.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2004 17:00:55 -0000 Received: by pippin.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87EB4CD28A; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:00:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] fix unwind handling on hppa elf targets Message-ID: <20040410174501.GB31873@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20040410094328.GA31873@tausq.org> <20040410165744.GH1114@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040410165744.GH1114@gnat.com> X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > It looks like the value of is_elf is undefined in the case of hppa32-hpux. > I think you need to set it to zero in hppa_gdbarch_init(). hrm, i thought the struct is zero-filled, but you are right, i guess it is not. > I'd like to be given some time to test this patch on hppa32 and hppa64 > before this gets checked in. Would that be ok? pls do. i do try to test hpux2.0w, but i don't have access to a narrow hpux machine to test. thanks, :) randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/