From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GDB64 ppc64 compile error patch
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040407141002.00713138@saguaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404071418140.9321@lazy>
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:37:30 -0500 (CDT)
Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes compile error when gdb is built as a 64bit binary on a
> PPC64 platform. ELF_NGREG ELF_NFPREG and ELF_NVRREG are members of an
> enum, but they are also defined in a headerfile, so compiler issues error.
>
> gcc -c -m64 -mminimal-toc -I. -I. -I./config
> -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -I./../include/opcode -I./../readline/.. -I../bfd -I./../bfd
> -I./../include -I../intl -I./../intl -DMI_OUT=1 -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type
> -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith
> -Wuninitialized -Wformat-nonliteral -Wunused-label -Wunused-function
> ppc-linux-tdep.c
> cc1: warning: -Wuninitialized is not supported without -O
> ppc-linux-tdep.c:956: error: parse error before numeric constant
> make[1]: *** [ppc-linux-tdep.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/manjo/April07/xxx/new/src/gdb'
> make: *** [all-gdb] Error 2
>
> This is because ELF_NGREG ELF_NFPREG and ELF_NVRREG are defined in header
> files
>
> /usr/include/sys/procfs.h:#define ELF_NFPREG 33 /* includes
> fpscr */
> /usr/include/sys/procfs.h:typedef elf_fpreg_t elf_fpregset_t[ELF_NFPREG];
> /usr/include/asm-ppc/elf.h:#define ELF_NFPREG 33 /* includes fpscr
> */
> /usr/include/asm-ppc/elf.h:typedef elf_fpreg_t elf_fpregset_t[ELF_NFPREG];
> /usr/include/asm-ppc64/elf.h:#define ELF_NFPREG 33 /* includes fpscr
> */
> /usr/include/asm-ppc64/elf.h:typedef elf_fpreg_t
> elf_fpregset_t[ELF_NFPREG];
>
> and the enum
>
> enum {
> ELF_NGREG = 48,
> ELF_NFPREG = 33,
> ELF_NVRREG = 33
> };
>
> causes the compiler to interpret ELF_NFPREG = 33, as 33 = 33, etc.
>
> The patch attached fixes this error.
Thanks for the patch. Before I apply it (or make other changes to
avoid the problem), I'd like to have a better understanding of
precisely what is going wrong.
A cursory inspection of the sources doesn't give any clue about how
any of the header files that you mention above are being included in
ppc-linux-tdep.c. If we could figure out how the offending system
header is being included and prevent its inclusion, we could avoid
redefining the enum constants as macros. IMO, that would be a
preferable course of action since we don't want system headers
tainting any *-tdep.c code anyway.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 19:45 Manoj Iyer
2004-04-07 21:10 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2004-04-07 21:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404071631450.19885@lazy>
2004-04-08 17:02 ` [RFC] " Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040407141002.00713138@saguaro \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=manjo@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox