From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11772 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2004 22:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11764 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2004 22:17:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2004 22:17:18 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B9tS9-0002be-W0; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 17:17:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: r6144 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/dwarf] Partial DIE support for specifications Message-ID: <20040403221725.GA9992@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: r6144 , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <16494.59235.964535.885069@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16494.59235.964535.885069@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:33:39AM +0800, r6144 wrote: Content-Description: message body text > I'm relatively new to gdb hacking. Does it mean that > inter-compilation-unit references will work and > -feliminate-dwarf2-dups will work? That would be great :) No, but try the branch I posted information about to gdb@ in the end of February. I think I cc'd you. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer