From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12106 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2004 17:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11936 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 17:30:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 17:30:55 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B9SVK-000815-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:30:54 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7AE324B104; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:31:11 -0500 (EST) To: brobecker@gnat.com, cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Do not abort prematurely the test upon build failure Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040402173111.7AE324B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 17:30:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 Joel> lib/ada.exp (gdb_compile_ada): Emit UNSUPPORTED if we failed Joel> to build the application. Remove the message printed when in Joel> verbose mode, redundant with the UNSUPPORTED message above. ac> Michael, shouldn't this be "UNTESTED"? The feature works, we just ac> failed to test it. I favor UNSUPPORTED for this, because the Ada compiler failed to run on that platform. Thus Ada is unsupported on that specific machine. It's a bit of an assumption to go from that specific machine to all machines of that platform, though. I won't object if someone gives a result of UNTESTED in a situation like this, though. Michael C