From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11108 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2004 21:34:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11030 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 21:34:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 21:34:50 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B84PA-0008SG-3y; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:34:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jeff Johnston Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] New thread test to exercise Daniel's Patch Message-ID: <20040329213444.GA32070@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Johnston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <40633F75.5010908@redhat.com> <20040326175906.GA21136@nevyn.them.org> <406472FB.4010905@redhat.com> <40649CEE.4070607@redhat.com> <20040326211958.GA31610@nevyn.them.org> <4068658F.2070903@redhat.com> <20040329181122.GB22039@nevyn.them.org> <4068849B.7030800@redhat.com> <20040329204204.GA3251@nevyn.them.org> <40688F40.1010106@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40688F40.1010106@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 04:04:00PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Ok, I had the thread checks in the Continue test. If I change it to the > way above, now I get 3 "Process no longer exists "messages but the test > completes. :( > > I'm really starting to hate these test macros. What is the reasoning > behind avoiding send_gdb / gdb_expect? They don't automatically handle things like internal errors, disconnects, et cetera. Want to post your current version and I'll give it a try? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer