From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24825 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 23:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24801 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 23:46:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 23:46:11 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B711c-0000r5-AV; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:46:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] (testsuite/Ada) Add gdb_compile_ada Message-ID: <20040326234608.GA3233@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040224230812.GE542@gnat.com> <20040225183211.GH1105@gnat.com> <20040225201749.GA21911@nevyn.them.org> <20040226223742.GH1154@gnat.com> <20040226230239.GA8487@nevyn.them.org> <20040303042107.GB1146@gnat.com> <20040305041814.GI5320@nevyn.them.org> <20040305060322.GD1226@gnat.com> <20040305164815.GB23778@nevyn.them.org> <20040326234255.GM1483@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040326234255.GM1483@gnat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00690.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:42:55PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > I am finally taking the time to come back to this discussion. Sorry > about the long delay, I imagine that things have become a bit foggy > for you. > > I re-read the entire thread, and I think I can say this: > - you said that the changes to dejagnu itself looked reasonable to you. > So I'll submit them to the dejagnu maintainers. You may want to put them in both DejaGNU and somewhere under gdb/testsuite/lib for now, once you get some feedback from the DejaGNU maintainers; we don't want to unnecessarily bump the DejaGNU version requirement. > - There was only one remaining issue with the "begin" command > (Ada-only for now, but might become available in all languages > sometime in the future - I will take care of that). I will > start a new thread with a summary of what has been said and > try to answer your questions. > - The first Ada test looked sane :-). So I suggest we work on adding > a first version of the test without the currently-under-discussion > gdb_begin function. Sounds good! -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer