From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15635 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 23:18:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15618 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 23:17:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 23:17:58 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 9F21D47D62; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:17:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:18:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/amd64] Pb with parameter passing in inferior function call Message-ID: <20040326231757.GL1483@gnat.com> References: <20040324235125.GK5083@gnat.com> <200403251115.i2PBFWr7000741@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403251115.i2PBFWr7000741@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00687.txt.bz2 > 2004-02-24 J. Brobecker > > * amd64-tdep.c (amd64_classify): make RANGE_TYPE objects be part > of the INTEGER class. > > Tested on amd64-linux. No regression. > Ok to apply? > > Go ahead. This is fine for the branch too if you think it is > appropriate. Thank you. Checked in HEAD. I didn't apply to the branch, as it is not necessarily that a common problem and also because the branch is now frozen. We can always ask people to check a snapshot if they really need to. -- Joel