From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31495 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 03:08:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31483 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 03:08:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 03:08:46 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B6hi9-0007pb-Qo for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:08:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: support libthread_db xregset functions Message-ID: <20040326030845.GA30012@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4062FFA5.9040704@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4062FFA5.9040704@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:49:57AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Jim, > > + # See the definition of 'struct xregset_desc' in gregset.h. > + v::XREGSET_DESC:struct xregset_desc > *:xregset_desc:::::0::0:%p:current_gdbarch->xregset_desc > > Back in oct MarkK added "regset.h", while the write path is missing that > is definitly the right way to go. Yes, definitely. We need the write path to support things like cross generate-core-file anyway. I may rip out the indirection through thread-db for this particular case after 6.1. It seems increasingly clear that using enough of thread-db to support non-1:1 threading is no longer a useful feature. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer