From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21164 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 16:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21146 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 16:58:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.xcllnt.net) (209.128.86.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 16:58:27 -0000 Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2PGwHQk005227; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:58:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2PGwH02088994; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:58:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2PGw9t4088993; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:58:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:58:00 -0000 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Mark Kettenis Cc: kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64-unknown-freebsd Message-ID: <20040325165809.GB88901@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20040325091159.GB87599@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200403251145.i2PBjMUE000818@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403251145.i2PBjMUE000818@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00622.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:45:22PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:11:59 -0800 > From: Marcel Moolenaar > > Marcel, do you have a copyright assignment with the FSF for GDB? Yes, I do. I need to get the employer disclaimer form sent in though. > Without it we can't use your code :-(. Does this code give some > reasonable testsuite results? Does it support calling functions from > within GDB? I never got that working when I was hacking on this. There's plenty of things I haven't tried or done. Most of my efforts went into actually understanding what I was doing, and doing things the right way (AFAICT of course). > Anyway, Marcel, here are some hints: Consider them all taken care of. I'll start focussing on the testsuite as well. > That said, I think you're on the right track with TARGET_OBJECT_DIRTY. Ok, thanks. That's one of the things I wanted feedback on. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net