From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2552 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 19:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2543 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 19:39:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 19:39:29 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4Pq4-0004sl-7Q; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:39:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Daniel, thread vs. fork question. Message-ID: <20040319193928.GA18671@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <404FBC18.4090909@redhat.com> <20040311015126.GA17829@nevyn.them.org> <404FCD75.4080606@redhat.com> <405B4A2B.3050204@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405B4A2B.3050204@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:29:47PM +0000, Michael Snyder wrote: > Hey Daniel, have you had a chance to try and reproduce this? > I've now had a second (completely unrelated) person call it to > my attention. New information -- I've got two fenceposts for you. > > Apparently this did not happen as of 11/29/2002, but did happen > as of 1/6/2004. These dates are from the internal Red Hat > repository, though, so they probably lag the dates in sourceware > somewhat. Sorry, I haven't - but I did see something similar from another source internally this week. Go figure. I'm traveling right now - will try to look at this Monday or Tuesday. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer