From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28227 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 16:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28212 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 16:50:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 16:50:05 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B4NBv-0006x3-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:49:51 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5F1AB4B104; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:49:50 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add meaningful section titles to PROBLEMS Message-Id: <20040319164950.5F1AB4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:50:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2 As David C pointed out, "regressions since 5.3" is factually wrong, anyways -- the deficiences in that section have always been in gdb. I'm in favor of keeping "regressions since 6.0" because those bugs really are regressions since 6.0, as demonstrated by testing. Most users of gdb 6.1 will be existing users of gdb 6.0 so they are going to be interested in what problems to expect when upgrading. I'm willing to abide by whatever Eli, the maintainer, decides. Michael C 2004-03-19 Andrew Cagney * PROBLEMS: Add general section titles, remove references to specific releases.