From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 15200 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 00:27:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 00:27:05 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B47qn-0006q9-H2; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:27:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , eliz@elta.co.il, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 Message-ID: <20040319002701.GB25876@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , eliz@elta.co.il, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040318162402.A32E34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <4059FC60.2090605@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4059FC60.2090605@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Now we don't get any. And for each user that takes > > the trouble to e-mail us, there are many more users who run into the > > issue and appreciate having a short description of it. > >I think we should keep that part of PROBLEMS as long as gdb has this > >problem. > > Definitly no. What do we gain by removing something that continues to be a major problem from the file named PROBLEMS? I just don't get it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer