From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 14027 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 00:25:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 00:25:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B47pk-0006pQ-2X; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:25:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 Message-ID: <20040319002556.GA25876@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040317015343.3DA244B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <8296-Wed17Mar2004210500+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <4058B42C.8010007@gnu.org> <20040318163655.GA6165@nevyn.them.org> <4059F788.30001@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4059F788.30001@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00443.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:24:56PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >I think there's at least one more. > > FYI: h8300, mcore, mn10300, ns32k, sh64, vax, xstormy16 > > but none of these are "mainstream". Thanks. In that case, none other than PPC - since Eli's question was specifically what used glibc. I'm sure someone internally at some company(ies) has mn10300 and sh64 glibc ports but they aren't in the normal glibc tree. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer