From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15882 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2004 00:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15873 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2004 00:08:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Mar 2004 00:08:54 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2412B92; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:08:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4049168B.9040508@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc,6.1?] Use right frame ID in step_over_function References: <40416BAF.1020308@gnu.org> <404906FF.9040508@gnu.org> <20040305233935.GA13372@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040305233935.GA13372@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.y6hRFn0Foof8c0vUMAQfRcAvPGcgwMDAd2K92zadJNk@z> >>>Its pretty heavy a change to apply to that branch and this late. However, >>>> >like Joel's related patch, I suspect it will be needed :-/ >> >>> >>> I've checked this into the mainline. For the moment I think I'll drop >>> the idea of committing it to the branch. > > > Since I'm not sure if you answered this already - is there a platform > (presumably NetBSD/PPC?) on which this changes testsuite results, or > did you just see it in using GDB on that platform? Yes. NetBSD/PPC with a proper frame unwinder demonstrated an improvement (but the problem wasn't NetBSD specific). Andrew > Anyway, great - there's a hack in the ARM sigtramp unwinder that I > -suspect- is dead now. I'll investigate.