From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28112 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2004 21:08:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28102 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 21:08:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 21:08:00 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.53]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id BMF82757; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:06:48 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kevin Buettner Message-ID: <8011-Mon15Mar2004230512+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040315133002.0d21df91@saguaro> (message from Kevin Buettner on Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:30:02 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC] breakpoint.c: Don't let adjust_breakpoint_address() adjust watchpoints Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040315133002.0d21df91@saguaro> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.qrN-fgEpR44VWCG731O2XqDL-BBxI0-j0sHptbUFM6c@z> > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:30:02 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > > In the course of running the GDB testsuite on FR-V, I discovered that it's > a bad idea to adjust watchpoint addresses. If any adjustment is done, the > watchpoint ends up at the wrong address. The patch below simply disables > adjustment for watchpoints and some eventpoints. I'd like to hear more details. When do we need to adjust the breakpoint address, for starters?