From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-31367-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8472 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2004 17:24:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8438 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 17:24:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 17:24:44 -0000
Received: from zaretski (pns03-206-173.inter.net.il [80.230.206.173])
	by bilbo.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR)
	with ESMTP id COS28342;
	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:24:34 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <3405-Mon08Mar2004192321+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <404C9E34.4010809@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 08
	Mar 2004 11:24:20 -0500)
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Generate makefile dependencies
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
References: <404BBFD6.1060702@gnu.org> <6137-Mon08Mar2004080725+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <404C9E34.4010809@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20040319000900.q0f3YDQ593fhhu_lbG6RG9_OQHw2II9nYdUbL2v4bwQ@z>

> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:24:20 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> > 
> > Won't it be better to use "gcc -MM" when we compile with GCC?
> 
> It would, except we can't assume GCC :-(.

We can't assume, but we can test (and I think we do test already,
right?).