From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19978 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 15:28:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19883 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 15:28:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao04.cox.net) (68.1.17.241) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 15:28:52 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040302152841.LAYX10652.lakemtao04.cox.net@white> for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:28:41 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AyBox-0000xk-00 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:28:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files Message-ID: <20040302152835.GA3577@white> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040226020624.GA20473@white> <403E8717.2030007@gnu.org> <20040228172007.GA569@white> <20040302003339.GA2933@white> <4044A67B.5040900@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4044A67B.5040900@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.kNaPixmYnWbKfTouRBxAohL4GCvaGS9v4MJK7JtlUA8@z> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:21:31AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:33:39 -0500 > >>>From: Bob Rossi > >>> > >>>I am disappointed with the time it takes to have my small patches > >>>reviewed. Being someone who doesn't contribute often to GDB, and not > >>>knowing much about the project, what do you think my expectations should > >>>be? > > > > > >I think most, if not all, of the GDB maintainers share your > >disappointment. Unfortunately, the question how to shorten the > >patch-approval time doesn't seem to have simple answers, given the > >current number of active maintainers and their available resources. > > Bob, if there isn't a resonse within a week, please ping. > Eli, here are the numbers for this patch: > > 02-24: Posted > 02-25 > 02-26: I responded, passed buck to Elena, should have To:ed Elena :-( > 02-27: Question about when response would be > 02-28: > 02-29: > 03-01: Above post > 03-01: Ok. Thanks. Bob Rossi