From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14046 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 15:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13877 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 15:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 15:21:36 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7212B92; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:21:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4044A67B.5040900@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , Bob Rossi Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files References: <20040226020624.GA20473@white> <403E8717.2030007@gnu.org> <20040228172007.GA569@white> <20040302003339.GA2933@white> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.hkiK_lR0hgNOQo801FZcWaAy3Mr08W9uhfmHZzoL8b8@z> >>Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:33:39 -0500 >>> From: Bob Rossi >>> >>> I am disappointed with the time it takes to have my small patches >>> reviewed. Being someone who doesn't contribute often to GDB, and not >>> knowing much about the project, what do you think my expectations should be? > > > I think most, if not all, of the GDB maintainers share your > disappointment. Unfortunately, the question how to shorten the > patch-approval time doesn't seem to have simple answers, given the > current number of active maintainers and their available resources. Bob, if there isn't a resonse within a week, please ping. Eli, here are the numbers for this patch: 02-24: Posted 02-25 02-26: I responded, passed buck to Elena, should have To:ed Elena :-( 02-27: Question about when response would be 02-28: 02-29: 03-01: Above post 03-01: enjoy, Andrew