Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0

Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-20T15:38:06Z

> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:54:19 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> Er, this is what I wrote:
>
> > I'm objecting to:
> >
> >>> "Regressions since gdb 6.0"
> >>> and "Regressions since gdb 5.3".

If it's only the "Regressions since gdb X.Y" that you are opposed to,
I don't have anything against renaming them.

> > If specific problems are present in 6.1 and are going to _really_
> > hurt the user then they should be mentioned (if they happened to
> > be in 6.0 as well , oops).
> >
> > However, we should not allow PROBLEMS to accumulate just because
> > they are still present -- heavy editing is required to ensure that
> > the PROBLEMS file is both relevant and focused (Several releases
> > back I deleted chunks of README as, although technically correct,
> > they were simply not relevant).

I support these points.

Your initial messages in this thread sounded like you were opposed to
having in PROBLEMS entries from past releases. Sorry if I
misunderstood.