From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8407 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 15:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8394 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 15:47:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 15:47:45 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B0jSL-0007QD-3C; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:47:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Richard Earnshaw Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/arm] Handle bx and blx Message-ID: <20040309154745.GB27765@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Earnshaw , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040308142522.GA15288@nevyn.them.org> <200403081428.i28ES3410285@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403081428.i28ES3410285@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.L8kEK306AynsIo9DgaXZlOLlKyEbXFvhdztTQzzCNuU@z> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:28:03PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > Ahh, that's right. The offset will be a multiple of four but the > > PC+offset may not be. This OK then? > > > > -- > > Daniel Jacobowitz > > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer > > > > 2004-03-08 Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > * arm-tdep.c (thumb_get_next_pc): Handle Thumb BLX. > > Ok, thanks. Thanks. I've checked this in. Upon reflection, I also checked in both patches to the 6.1 branch. GDB's failure mode without them is a real nuisance. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer