From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-31226-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1633 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 00:33:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1599 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 00:33:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao01.cox.net) (68.1.17.244)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 00:33:41 -0000
Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakemtao01.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP
          id <20040302003340.BAGG28361.lakemtao01.cox.net@white>
          for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>;
          Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:33:40 -0500
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Axxqt-0000lw-00
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:33:39 -0500
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000
From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files
Message-ID: <20040302003339.GA2933@white>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <20040226020624.GA20473@white> <403E8717.2030007@gnu.org> <20040228172007.GA569@white>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040228172007.GA569@white>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20040319000900.K8dE5W70GBlpqCQGIN-5i8zGjqelCOXsZsWFfaRE2co@z>

On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:20:07PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 06:53:59PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Any chance this will make the 6.1 release?
> > >It would be *very* helpful if it did.
> > 
> > I'm sure it would, sigh.  6.1 is already kind of running a month late 
> > (it was ment to be branched in january).
> > 
> > Since it's touching both MI and symtab, Elena (pass buck) is probably 
> > best at reviewing it?
> 
> Just wondering ... how long does it usually take to get a patch
> approved?

I am disappointed with the time it takes to have my small patches
reviewed. Being someone who doesn't contribute often to GDB, and not
knowing much about the project, what do you think my expectations should be?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi