From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6480 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 05:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6473 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 05:43:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 05:43:44 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ay2de-0007Fu-Cf; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:40:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Bob Rossi CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040302003339.GA2933@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:33:39 -0500) Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040226020624.GA20473@white> <403E8717.2030007@gnu.org> <20040228172007.GA569@white> <20040302003339.GA2933@white> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.ITHEmJQcUXvpHqmm4OZTEZ6DofFJJ1t4VFddEPT62sA@z> > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:33:39 -0500 > From: Bob Rossi > > I am disappointed with the time it takes to have my small patches > reviewed. Being someone who doesn't contribute often to GDB, and not > knowing much about the project, what do you think my expectations should be? I think most, if not all, of the GDB maintainers share your disappointment. Unfortunately, the question how to shorten the patch-approval time doesn't seem to have simple answers, given the current number of active maintainers and their available resources.