From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17948 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2004 22:49:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17915 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 22:49:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 22:49:34 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28MnXST027055 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:49:33 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i28MnUM32759; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:49:31 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i28MnSR08596; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:49:28 -0800 Message-ID: <404CF878.1030808@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030922 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1" References: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.BupXgXPfZS_-6gjOUAsU0BrrxVQD2plb4mOhdTGg8yo@z> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > This is something that's always bugged me. I wanted to track a problem in > the testsuite using "set debug target 1", but the output was so incredibly > noisy (because of libthread_db) that everything timed out. This patch > changes "set debug target 1" to only print the first line of a memory > transfer, and documents "set debug target 2" to print the whole thing. > > Seem OK? > I think it's a great idea -- my only concern is with legacy issues. But I doubt if more than 3 people in the world ever use it, so I'm in favor. M