From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4546 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2004 22:08:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4535 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 22:08:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 22:08:27 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1852B92; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:08:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4056295A.1000702@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni Subject: Re: [RFA/dwarf] Don't process types multiple times References: <20040225044206.GA23242@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050203040902050607060100" X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.6fOjlUWAOY5Jo5XkoA4PC-HK1Ed5mGxdJryAmYlF2wc@z> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050203040902050607060100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 119 > Is that right? If so, please commit, to trunk and branch. Jim, Is this fixing a regression from GDB 6.0? Andrew --------------050203040902050607060100 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Attached Message" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Attached Message" Content-length: 3661 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cagney@localhost.redhat.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769882B92 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:07:40 -0500 (EST) Envelope-to: cagney@gnu.org Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:46:41 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.4) for cagney@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:07:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B11EX-0004YU-4v for cagney@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:46:41 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B11Gg-0003vv-V4 for cagney@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:49:26 -0500 Received: from [67.72.78.213] (helo=sources.redhat.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B11Gg-0003vD-JH for cagney@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:48:54 -0500 Received: (qmail 7998 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 10:48:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list gdb@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7987 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 10:48:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com) (81.96.64.123) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 10:48:41 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2AAkDCL020139; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:46:34 GMT Received: (from aph@localhost) by redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2AAkDnc020135; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:46:13 GMT From: Andrew Haley MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16462.61941.71827.936295@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:46:13 +0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org, "Boehm, Hans" Subject: Re: gdb vs. gcj X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Content-length: 1081 CCd to gdb for info. Hans, can you provide some more info? When does it crash? Can you provide a gdb backtrace? Andrew. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ranjit Mathew Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org To: java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gdb vs. gcj Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:05:44 +0530 Boehm, Hans wrote: > I'm having problems with various versions of gdb crashing with SIGSEGV when trying to debug > any executables that include libgcj (cvs trunk from about a week ago). > > I've seen this on both X86 and Itanium, both with older RedHat releases (8.0 and 7.1). > > Does this ring any bells? Did I miss something? If GDB is crashing for you, it *could be* due to the recent location lists related changes in GCC that are properly handled only by the currently in CVS (and to be released as 6.1) GDB. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.5/changes.html HTH, Ranjit. -- Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT hotmail DOT com Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/ --------------050203040902050607060100--