From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11102 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 15:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11055 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 15:56:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 15:56:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2GFu14b019335 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:56:01 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2GFu1j24195 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:56:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-70.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.70]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2GFu0es015647 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:56:00 -0500 Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2GFttcG018119 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:55:55 -0700 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:rs6000] Framefy rs6000 (and GNU/Linux PPC) Message-ID: <20040316085554.0850a346@saguaro> In-Reply-To: <40563368.3040904@gnu.org> References: <40428F53.5080502@gnu.org> <20040302160100.573bbadc@saguaro> <4045FB6B.9080700@gnu.org> <4055F5D1.1020306@gnu.org> <20040315131520.14d61b41@saguaro> <40563368.3040904@gnu.org> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.1PsjSd3hFlGFIF7OeL_pCeSNby6JOzlr8q8MquNjsAk@z> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:51:20 -0500 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Perhaps. I'm checking into this now... > > In the mean time (the question was posted two weeks ago), can the above > be removed from mainline? It's what's being done for other architectures. No. Please commit your patch as posted. I will follow up in a day or so and address the problem code. (I have been looking at this, and am waiting for test results.) Kevin