From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22955 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 22:54:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22810 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 22:54:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 22:54:17 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B3jvU-0004tA-00; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:54:16 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id E42474B104; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:54:23 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040317225423.E42474B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:54:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00414.txt > There are problems in all the releases, we don't list them. The title of the file is "Known problems in GDB 6.1". Indeed, I would like it to actually list all the known problems. We just don't have the resources to do this yet. > The objective here is to draw the users attention to places where gdb is > both better and worse than the _last_ release (6.0). Not a sorry list > of problems dateing back to version 0.0. NEWS dates back to version 0.0, so I think that PROBLEMS should as well. Michael C From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22955 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 22:54:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22810 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 22:54:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 22:54:17 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B3jvU-0004tA-00; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:54:16 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id E42474B104; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:54:23 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20040317225423.E42474B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.hm38js6PaciTjVdUkTe7oQDltihWUiMftKgOfLPXqzg@z> > There are problems in all the releases, we don't list them. The title of the file is "Known problems in GDB 6.1". Indeed, I would like it to actually list all the known problems. We just don't have the resources to do this yet. > The objective here is to draw the users attention to places where gdb is > both better and worse than the _last_ release (6.0). Not a sorry list > of problems dateing back to version 0.0. NEWS dates back to version 0.0, so I think that PROBLEMS should as well. Michael C