From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-31614-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12302 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 20:13:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12294 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 20:13:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 20:13:04 -0000
Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049)
	id 73D3AC553; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:13:04 -0800 (PST)
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Subject: [commit] change testsuite reference from PR 826 to 1588
From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:13:00 -0000
Message-ID: <yf2r7vrxmen.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion,
 linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00405.txt
Message-ID: <20040317201300.Jim87spGneZUO83FdxC6NY37F5lFqfP1TMlEtxKVMeE@z>

As discussed in another e-mail thread, I've filed PR gdb/1588 to more
closely match a particular failure in classes.exp; this updates
classes.exp accordingly.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com

2004-03-17  David Carlton  <carlton@kealia.com>

	* gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of
	PR c++/826.

Index: classes.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 classes.exp
--- classes.exp	9 Mar 2004 17:34:39 -0000	1.9
+++ classes.exp	17 Mar 2004 20:10:24 -0000
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
     }
 
     # I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
-    # See PR gdb/826.
+    # See PR gdb/1588.
 
     gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
 	-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
 	-re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
 	    # "parse error" is bison 1.35.
 	    # "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
-	    kfail "gdb/826" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
+	    kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
 	}
     }