From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28433 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 19:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28425 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 19:07:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 19:07:13 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-208-141.inter.net.il [80.230.208.141]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BMM08364; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:06:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:07:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: David Carlton Message-ID: <8296-Wed17Mar2004210500+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from David Carlton on Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:19:23 -0800) Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040317015343.3DA244B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00396.txt Message-ID: <20040317190700.bHn2UqIlmY7yW57SNMaJstEjQVE_KjygY9Kl2611uXI@z> > From: David Carlton > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:19:23 -0800 > > While we're updating PROBLEMS, is the list of targets that don't use > the new frame code accurate? (Sparc, mips, ppc, arm.) Do users care? What user-level effect will one see on those targets that don't use the new frame code? IMHO, if there are no user-level issues, we shouldn't mention this in PROBLEMS.