Re: [RFA] minsyms.c: Fix switching to GNU v3 ABI

Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-10T16:43:45Z

On Mar 10 17:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 10 11:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Move the check earlier? It should not be necessary to change
> > SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME. I think you could do this in
> > prim_record_minimal_symbol_and_info at the call site of
> > SYMBOL_SET_NAMES.
>
> I'm more and more under the impression that the problem is raised due
> to a bug in the symbol generation in gcc. It doesn't seem worth to
> change GDB proactively...

Wait a second. If the symbols actually begin with _Z as they do e.g. on
Linux, then the test we're talking about would fail on Linx, too, if...
yes, if leading_char would be "_" on Linux as well. But on Linux the
leading_char is \0.

So, it looks like the actual problem is, that SYMBOL_SET_NAMES is
called in prim_record_minimal_symbol_and_info, without having stripped
the leading_char from the symbol names.

That doesn't explain why there's one symbol which has no leading _
but that would make sense for all other mangled symbols given in the
object file, right?

Corinna

--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.