From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10628 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 02:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10577 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 02:06:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 02:06:12 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B0t6k-00009G-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:06:07 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id E1DE94B104; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:06:21 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, drow@false.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb.cp/classes.exp: Don't try to print local variable out of scope Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com, vinschen@redhat.com Message-ID: <20040310020621.E1DE94B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:06:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00221.txt Message-ID: <20040310020600.YeTdI4zMYGSFi8e9pNl7zgWIq1IcC4gQCJBTgK1a4L8@z> Too busy to look right now, but my recollection is that gcc 3.4.X (and later) actually behave a little differently for inner blocks versus the outermost block of a function. That is, my recollection is that the scoping problem happens only with the outermost block. Michael C