From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28538 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2004 05:39:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28395 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2004 05:39:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2004 05:39:34 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-197-129.inter.net.il [80.230.197.129]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id COM76030; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:38:51 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 05:39:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-ID: <3791-Sun07Mar2004073738+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:08:35 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00131.txt Message-ID: <20040307053900.pVGZr9Rzy6qJNtOw64jaBVsssh8lEfLN5k8Q9u-g810@z> > Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:08:35 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Seem OK? Thanks for the documentation patch, but I have 2 minor comments: > @item set debug target > Turns on or off display of @value{GDBN} target debugging info. This info > includes what is going on at the target level of GDB, as it happens. The > -default is off. > +default is 0. Set it to 1 to track events, and to 2 to also track the > +value of large memory transfers. This flag must be set before connecting > +to the target or saying @code{run}. . I'm not sure I understand this sentence--do you mean to say that _if_ the flag is set, it must be set _before_ connecting and before "run"? If so, I suggest to use @emph and/or @strong to make sure the reader understands you, and maybe rephrase slightly to make sure the wording is less ambiguous. . Since in this context "run" is something the user types, it should be @kbd{run}, not @code{run}. Otherwise, it is okay to go in.